IMPLEXI MUNDI: International Arts and Sciences Complexity Worlds
IMPLEXI MUNDI: International Arts and Sciences Complexity Worlds
Bio Semiotics of Value
By: Sam Leven on: Tue 13 of Oct, 2009 [00:34 UTC] (387 reads)
Behavioral economics and neuroeconomics each touches a piece of the ways decisions are made. What's missing are the issues Bateson and Pribram tried to raise: impacts of environments (internal, "home", social networks, and reigning paradigms), uncertainty and ignorance, and the "internalizing of the other" (both traditional and modern cybernetic).

Understanding our own limitations can inform the ways we think and talk about problems like climate and poverty — and how we listen.

Dynamic semiotics should — and must — play a central role in discovering values we can embrace and share.
(0 bytes) Print

1 comment
 

Posted messages

Top Hide all
author message
JerryLRChandler
Bio Semiotics of Value
on: Mon 23 of Nov, 2009 [23:48 UTC] score: 0.00
"Biosemiotics" is such a broad term that little can be said about it that carries substantial meaning.
In order to study the issues, C S Peirce (1839-1914) categorized various signs into several categories related to logical terminology. Peirce's writings are a "must read" for anyone serious about semiotics.

Modern understanding of signs and codes has substantially altered the situation. Today, we sharply separate the conceptualization of symbol systems as means of written human communication from both mathematical codes of machine communication and from natural signs emerging from the spontaneity of nature.

Biosemiotics demands, as you, Bateson and others point out, a dynamic between the individual and the surrounding; the "home" or "ecosis" of the individual, the relatives that influence memory and learning in context of the genetic capabilities of the organism.

We need a new language to talk about these relationships as neither deductive or inductive logic really fits the reality of the situations.

George Soros speaks of "reflexivity" as one possible term to extend our vocabulary into the mutually influential relations that bind semiotics to values. Is this a good term for your purposes, Sam?

Cheers

Jerry





Page: 1/1

 
Login
[ register | I forgot my password ]
 
Support ImplexiMundi